Alan Steel
01506 842365
MENU
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Close
    • About Us
    • What We Do
      • Close
      • What We Do
      • Our Services
      • Our Philosophy
      • Our Awards
      • Our Reputation
    • Who We Are
      • Close
      • Who We Are
      • Meet the team
    • Our Approach
    • Financial Planning
  • Testimonials
  • Investments
    • Close
    • Investments
    • Investment Advice
    • Portfolio Building
  • Pensions
    • Close
    • Pensions
    • Retirement Planning
    • Early Retirement
    • Pensions as simple as...
  • Tax
    • Close
    • Tax
    • Tax Advice
    • Tax Planning
    • When I'm Dead and Gone
    • Inheritance Tax
    • HMRC Digital Accounts
  • Insights & Media
    • Close
    • Insights & Media
    • Letters from Linlithgow
    • Informing You
    • Letter from America
    • See us in the Press
    • Master Investor
    • Points of Few
  • Contact Us
Independent financial advisers founded in 1975
Over £1.4 billion client funds under management
17 industry awards for advice since 1989

See us in the Press

Personal Account: Is it worth paying for professionals?

Sunday, 18 October, 2015

Investors are flooding into ‘passive’ tracker funds, but cut-price charges are blinding the punters to a fatal flaw in their performance

While many doubt whether City stock-pickers really add value, professional fund management can pay dividends in the long run

A nasty power struggle in the Square Mile and dismal investment returns make this a good time to ask the question: is it worth paying for professional fund management?

Most investors seem to have decided the answer is no. Just look at the figures showing that tracker funds, which passively follow a stock market index rather than charge for active share selection, account for three-quarters of new sales. The Investment Association’s most recent monthly figures show net retail inflows of £690m, of which £527m — or 76% — went into tracker, or “passive”, funds.

After 15 years in which the FTSE 100 index of Britain’s biggest shares has made no progress — remarkably, it still trades below the 6,930 it closed at on December 30, 1999 — the explanation would appear to be that many investors doubt whether City stock-pickers really add value.

Worse still, at about 1.5%, the fees for actively managed funds are more than twice as high as the typical costs of passive unit trusts and exchange-traded funds.

Nobody seemed to care much about annual management charges during the great bull run of the 1990s, when many equity investors enjoyed double-digit gains. Yet now the annual costs of actively managed funds often absorb nearly a quarter of average gross returns — which have sunk to 7% over the long term, and rather less recently.

Rising investor cynicism and falling fees have sparked an existential struggle high up in the plate-glass palaces of the Square Mile. For example, I was sad to see Daniel Godfrey, chief executive of the Investment Association, defenestrated after he urged fund managers to be more open about costs and to put their clients first. He is a good man who did not deserve to be ousted from his post.

Rather than getting bogged down in the rights and wrongs of a trade dispute, I asked some financial advisers and intermediaries to scrutinise returns since the turn of the century to see if active fund management beat passive index-tracking. …….

……  Perhaps surprisingly, their calculations show that £10,000 invested in the average UK equity income unit trust would have grown to £24,500 since the turn of the century, compared with just £16,300 in the average UK tracker fund. Both figures include charges and reinvested income (dividends).   ……

……  I invest about 80% of my “forever fund” directly in shares to keep costs down and yields up — sometimes with horrible shocks, such as Volkswagen, discussed here last month. But the rest of the money is in funds, particularly smaller companies funds with managers who seem likely to add value. They can scrutinise corporate acorns many of us have never heard of before they become the oaks of tomorrow.   ……

……  Alan Steel, who will celebrate 40 years as an independent financial adviser next week, pointed out a fundamental problem with passive funds: “The best way to create investment profits is to buy low and sell high, but tracker funds do the exact opposite. They are overexposed to shares trading above their fair value and underexposed to shares trading below their fair value. The more a share rises, the more tracker funds have to buy, and vice versa.”

So, as in many walks of life, the cheapest option is not necessarily the best value. Cost should not be our only criterion in matters of importance — as I hope readers of this newspaper will agree. That’s why, despite soaring sales of trackers, I continue to believe it can pay to stump up for professional fund management and shrewd stock selection.

Quote courtesy of The SundayTtimes
Sunday 18 October 2015

©2023 Alan Steel Asset Management Limited is authorised & regulated by The Financial Conduct Authority. Please note that the Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate some forms of tax advice. Company Registration: SC58014

You should remember that the value of an investment and the income from it could go down as well as up. The return at the end of the investment period is not guaranteed and you may get back less than you originally invested.

The investment services and/or investments referred to in this website may not be suitable for you. If you are unsure we suggest you contact us to discuss matters further. If we believe our services are not right for you we will tell you.

When investing money, whether for income or growth, you are placing your capital at risk as the value of investments may vary, so you could get back less than you started with.

The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate Tax Advice, Trusts or wills. Alan Steel Asset Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The guidance contained in this website is subject to the regulatory regime of the UK.

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is an agency for arbitrating on unresolved complaints between regulated firms and their clients.

FOS details can be found at www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk

Alan Steel Asset Management Limited are not responsible for the content of external sites.

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website terms and conditions
  • Tax Services Privacy Notice
  • Contact Us

This site uses cookies. By using this site you agree to the use of cookies. Read our Cookie Policy